
Um... is there anything, um, you need... oh ok, well, um, I'm just over here if you..ok...thanks
I nearly choked on my morning brunch bar when I spotted the Guardian’s lead last week on the exploitation of interns.
How convenient they’ve chosen to focus on the MPs who exploit interns. Well, let’s turn things right back around. I know work experience. I PERSONIFIED work experience for five years.
Let’s get one thing EXTREMELY clear. It is not the recession which has caused exploitation of work experiencers. This is a very very very very old phenomena. It has just meant there are more people willing to be exploited. Just like the recession hasn’t actually caused the crisis in the media in general, it’s just speeding things up a bit.
My mum pointed out the other day in said Guardian there was a page on office fashion. One outfit for chief executive, one for middle manager, one for personal assistants, one for your first job and one for….interns. There’s so bloody many of them, there’s even their own fashion category. Jesus.
Exploitation is taken for granted, and there are hundreds of thousands of us lining up to be exploited. I spent every summer since I was 17 working for free on local papers. I spent every weekend at university editing the local paper. What did I gain from this financially? Nothing, absolutely zero. If anyone had offered me expenses I’d have been amazed.
What did I gain experience-wise?
CLICHED ANSWER: Of course I learnt everything I know about journalism, and it was like, so totally worth it
TRUTH: It was patchy to say the least.
I had some places that were beyond wonderful. My internships at BBC Radio Five Live, Yorkshire Evening Post and at the Jewish Chronicle were fabulous. Why? Not because they went above and beyond the call of duty, because quite frankly, they didn’t. They just stood up to the mark. They taught me hard lessons about my copy, they gave me real stories, not press releases, they let me sit in on conferences, they let me do interviews and they got me published and they remembered my name.
Others were utter shite. One paper had the audacity to say “I hope you haven’t come down to London especially to do this, or cancelled anything, because sometimes people do, and then we get embarrassed.”
So you should be embarrassed! Of course people come to London especially, what do you bloody think?
And while I’m having a rant, the Guardian, for all their preaching are as bad. I’d even go so far as to say they were worse just because of the sheer audacity of their summer work experience scheme exclusively for ethnic minorities. I’m really all for widening access but sorry Guardian, no cigar. All you’ll get is rich, middle-class ethnic minorities whose parents can support them while they undertake unpaid work. What about working class white people? Fuck them shall we? They don’t fit in a diversity tick box.
What would really widen participation, would be to pay these interns. Like the one who probably did the research for the article. My humblest apologies to Mr Ben Carter (as in who did “additional reporting by” in the Guardian’s piece) but because of the subject matter, I’m willing to take a gamble you’re an intern.
So how will we really solve this? Structured internship programmes, in an American style model, paid. It’ll sort the real wheat from the rich chaff.







































November 24, 2008
Welcome to the pick ‘n’ mix
Ok, I admit it. I’m a very typical Guardian reader. I like organic food and Pret a Manger. I don’t believe in SUVs. I’m young, I’m a student and I’m about to enter a respectable profession, and I like to think of myself as well informed. In fact, the Guardian is my homepage.
But recently, although it sometimes feels a bit like a shameful affair from a loyal lover, I have (gasp) been reading other newspapers.
Since the financial crisis reared its mangy head, I’ve become a devotee of the Financial’s Times’ analysis, who are consistently first on the ball with national and international business news, streaks ahead of the other broadsheets. The inimitable Robert Fisk’s blog on the Independent website is unmatchable. And although the Observer was always my Sunday paper of choice, lately I’ve been casting a wandering, lustful eye across to the Sunday Times, whose Style magazine and features supplements are absolutely top notch. The Times has now become my second choice paper (replacing the Independent), and when the Guardian headline annoys me, I’ll often pick up a Times instead (it was the only paper not to have the Ross/Brand hideousness on the front page a few weeks ago, reason enough to give them my money)
(And where else am I supposed to get my daily fix of Cheryl Cole’s latest outfits/dilemmas/ drama? Why, from the Daily Mirror of course, the only paper that’s more obsessed with her than I am. This might be the first year this millennium that Miss Cole has featured on more front pages since Princess Diana.)
As Shane Richmond, Communities Editor for Telegraph.co.uk told us in our Online Journalism Lecture, communities of readers used to be built around titles, in the way Jim Hacker describes i
n Yes Prime Minister.
But now it’s a pick ‘n’ mix free for all. Telegraph readers no longer just go for the fried eggs, they might try a cola bottle once in a while, or even a liquorice allsort.
The single biggest referrer for news is Google. We don’t just head for our favourite news website, like BBC News to find out about a breaking news story. We grab the hint from Twitter, and type it into Google, and see where it takes us. Want American news? Well the best place for that is the New York Times, not your trusty Guardian, although it’s great to have that too.
And audiences can be built at section level, or even purely at columist level or single article level. Now you can have your favourite titbits rolling into your RSS feed, like Media Guardian, coupled with the Times’ sport coverage, and showbiz from the 3am girls.
But newspapers then face a challenge from their polygamous readership. A need to retain brand loyalty, like the stereotypes that once existed is crucial to commercial success, and websites have to work harder to keep readers loyal.
One of the key ways to do this is through online participation. The Telegraph, perhaps against what one might expect from a paper with very traditional news values, has been one of the first to adopt digitalisation, through the creation of My Telegraph, where readers can blog under the Telegraph masthead, and be sure of a wide audience.
As Shane Richmond points out:
The same is true of the Guardian’s Comment is Free, and the BBC’s Have Your Say. They have loyal users, who stay true to their online community. And they’re self-regulating, because if views expressed there are too extreme, they will instantly be blasted by other bloggers.
Pick ‘n’ Mix news is one of the most exciting aspects of web journalism, and it keeps us journalists on our toes, because we’ve no longer got the comfort of knowing that readers, once they’ve bought the paper, are hemmed into our news, features and sport. But if we can give them a community, like the one that used to exist between Telegraph readers, and between Mail readers, and between Guardian readers, then perhaps we can keep them faithful too, and hope they don’t stray too far for good.
Leave a Comment
Filed under General Interest, Online Journalism, People I've Met
Tags: 3am girls, Comment is Free, Have Your Say, My Telgraph, Online Journalism, Pick n Mix, Shane Richmond, The Guardian, The Independent, The Mirror, The Observer, The Sunday Times, The Times